* maint:
gitweb: Fix 'history' view for deleted files with history
Document that WebDAV doesn't need git on the server, and works over SSL
git-remote: reject adding remotes with invalid names
am: POSIX portability fix
When asked for history of a file which is not present in given branch
("HEAD", i.e. current branch, or given by transient $hash_hase ('hb')
parameter), but is present deeper in the history (meaning that "git
rev-list --full-history $hash_base -- $file_name" is not empty), and
there is no $hash ('h') parameter set for a file, gitweb would spew
multiple of "Use of uninitialized value" warnings, and some links
would be missing. This commit fixes this bug.
This bug occurs in the rare cases when "git log -- <path>" is empty
and "git log --full-history -- <path>" is not, or to be more exact in
the cases when full-history starts later than given branch. It can
happen if you are using handcrafted gitwb URL, or if you follow
generic 'history' link or bookmark for a file which got deleted.
Gitweb tried to get file type ('tree', or 'blob', or even 'commit')
from the commit we start searching from (where the file was not
present), and not among found commits. This was the cause of "Use of
uninitialized value" warnings.
This commit also add tests for such situation to t9500 test.
While we are it, return HTTP error if there is _no_ history; it means
that file or directory was not found (for given branch). Also error
out if type of item could not be found: it should not happen now, but
better be sure.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This can happen if the arguments to git-remote add is switched by the
user, and git would only show an error if fetching was also requested.
Fix it by using the refspec parsing engine to check if the requested
name can be parsed as a remote before add it.
Also cleanup so that the "remote.<name>.url" config name buffer is only
initialized once.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Traditionally git-rebase was implemented in terms of "format-patch" piped
to "am -3", to strike balance between speed (because it avoids a rather
expensive read-tree/merge-recursive machinery most of the time) and
flexibility (the magic "-3" allows it to fall back to 3-way merge as
necessary). However, this combination has one flaw when dealing with a
nonstandard commit log message format that has more than one lines in the
first paragraph.
This teaches "git am --rebasing" to take advantage of the fact that the
mbox message "git rebase" prepares for it records the original commit
object name, to get the log message from the original commit object
instead.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
git-bisect: make "start", "good" and "skip" succeed or fail atomically
git-am: cope better with an empty Subject: line
Ignore leading empty lines while summarizing merges
bisect: squelch "fatal: ref HEAD not a symref" misleading message
builtin-apply: Show a more descriptive error on failure when opening a patch
Clarify documentation of git-cvsserver, particularly in relation to git-shell
* maint-1.5.4:
git-bisect: make "start", "good" and "skip" succeed or fail atomically
git-am: cope better with an empty Subject: line
Ignore leading empty lines while summarizing merges
bisect: squelch "fatal: ref HEAD not a symref" misleading message
builtin-apply: Show a more descriptive error on failure when opening a patch
Clarify documentation of git-cvsserver, particularly in relation to git-shell
Before this patch, when "git bisect start", "git bisect good" or
"git bisect skip" were called with many revisions, they could fail
after having already marked some revisions as "good", "bad" or
"skip".
This could be especilally bad for "git bisect start" because as
the file ".git/BISECT_NAMES" would not have been written, there
would have been no attempt to clear the marked revisions on a
"git bisect reset". That's because if there is no
".git/BISECT_NAMES" file, nothing is done to clean things up, as
the bisect session is not supposed to have started.
While at it, let's also create the ".git/BISECT_START" file, only
after ".git/BISECT_NAMES" as been created.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
git clean: Add test to verify directories aren't removed with a prefix
git clean: Don't automatically remove directories when run within subdirectory
git-submodule - possibly use branch name to describe a module
The earlier one botched the return value logic between config_bool and
config_bool_and_int. The former should normalize between 0 and 1 while
the latter should give back full range of integer values.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --for-status option is mainly used by builtin-status/commit.
It adds 'Modified submodules:' line at top and '# ' prefix to all
following lines.
Signed-off-by: Ping Yin <pkufranky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The script had an unconditional output done outside of test_expect_*
construct, which leaked out and contaminated the output without -v.
Squelch it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also tighten test to require it to be correct.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
bisect: fix bad rev checking in "git bisect good"
revision.c: make --date-order overriddable
git-submodule: Avoid 'fatal: cannot describe' message
Force the medium pretty format on calls to git log
Fix section about backdating tags in the git-tag docs
Document option --only of git commit
Documentation/git-request-pull: Fixed a typo ("send" -> "end")
* maint-1.5.4:
bisect: fix bad rev checking in "git bisect good"
revision.c: make --date-order overriddable
Fix section about backdating tags in the git-tag docs
Document option --only of git commit
Documentation/git-request-pull: Fixed a typo ("send" -> "end")
It seems that "git bisect good" and "git bisect skip" have never
properly checked arguments that have been passed to them. As soon
as one of them can be parsed as a SHA1, no error or warning would
be given.
This is because 'git rev-parse --revs-only --no-flags "$@"' always
"exit 0" and outputs all the SHA1 it can found from parsing "$@".
This patch fix this by using, for each "bisect good" argument, the
same logic as for the "bisect bad" argument.
While at it, this patch teaches "bisect bad" to give a meaningfull
error message when it is passed more than one argument.
Note that if "git bisect good" or "git bisect skip" is given some
proper revs and then something that is not a proper rev, then the
first proper revs will still have been marked as "good" or "skip".
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
git-fetch: fix status output when not storing tracking ref
core-tutorial.txt: Fix showing the current behaviour.
git-archive: ignore prefix when checking file attribute
Fix documentation syntax of optional arguments in short options.
* maint-1.5.4:
core-tutorial.txt: Fix showing the current behaviour.
git-archive: ignore prefix when checking file attribute
Fix documentation syntax of optional arguments in short options.
Ulrik Sverdrup noticed that git-archive doesn't correctly apply the attribute
export-subst when the option --prefix is given, too.
When it checked if a file has the attribute turned on, git-archive would try
to look up the full path -- including the prefix -- in .gitattributes. That's
wrong, as the prefix doesn't need to have any relation to any existing
directories, tracked or not.
This patch makes git-archive ignore the prefix when looking up if value of the
attribute export-subst for a file.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* mk/unpack-careful:
t5300: add test for "index-pack --strict"
receive-pack: allow using --strict mode for unpacking objects
unpack-objects: fix --strict handling
t5300: add test for "unpack-objects --strict"
unpack-objects: prevent writing of inconsistent objects
When using git-svn to follow only a single (empty) path per
svn-remote (i.e. not using --stdlayout), following the history
of a renamed path was broken in
c586879cdf.
This reverts the regression for the single (emtpy) path per
svn-remote case.
To avoid breaking the tests in a committed revision, this is an
addendum to a patch originally submitted by
Santhosh Kumar Mani <santhoshmani@gmail.com>:
> git-svn: add test for renamed directory fetch
>
> This test tries to fetch a directory which had renames in the
> history from a SVN repository.
[ew: unneccesary dependency on the starting an HTTP server
removed from Santhosh's original test.]
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In commit 15387e3 (Test suite: reset TERM to its previous value after
testing., 2007-10-26), I added a workaround to reset TERM to its previous
value before the "test_done" at the end of "t7005-editor.sh" because
otherwise "test_done" would have printed the test result with a bad TERM
env variable (this resulted in output with no color on konsole).
But since commit c2116a1 (test-lib: fix TERM to dumb for test
repeatability, 2008-03-06), colored output is printed in a subshell with
TERM reset to its original value so the earlier workaround is not needed
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
An earlier commit 4be6096 (apply --unidiff-zero: loosen sanity checks for
--unidiff=0 patches, 2006-09-17) made match_beginning and match_end
computed incorrectly. If a hunk inserts at the beginning, old position
recorded at the hunk is line 0, and if a hunk changes at the beginning, it
is line 1. The new test added to t4104 exposes that the old code did not
insist on matching at the beginning for a patch to add a line to an empty
file.
An even older 65aadb9 (apply: force matching at the beginning.,
2006-05-24) was equally wrong in that it tried to take hints from the
number of leading context lines, to decide if the hunk must match at the
beginning, but we can just look at the line number in the hunk to decide.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* dd/cvsserver:
cvsserver: Use the user part of the email in log and annotate results
cvsserver: Add test for update -p
cvsserver: Implement update -p (print to stdout)
cvsserver: Add a few tests for 'status' command
cvsserver: Do not include status output for subdirectories if -l is passed
cvsserver: Only print the file part of the filename in status header
cvsserver: Respond to the 'editors' and 'watchers' commands
This test was already careful enough to skip signed tag tests if gpg
is not available, but it must also skip all verify tests, even those
that are about non-signed tags, because they also invoke gpg.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Update the verify_tag() function to remove an unnecessary test, and add
additional check for angle brackets in the name and email field, and
spaces in the email field. The timestamp and timezone sections are made
more straight forward by using strspn().
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit d89c1df (filter-branch: don't use xargs -0, 2008-03-12) replaced a
'ls-files | xargs rm' pipeline by 'git clean'. 'git clean' however does
not recurse and remove directories by default.
Now, consider a tree-filter that renames a directory.
1. For the first commit everything works as expected
2. Then filter-branch checks out the files for the next commit. This
leaves the new directory behind because there is no real "branch
switching" involved that would notice that the directory can be
removed.
3. Then filter-branch invokes 'git clean' to remove exactly those
left-overs. But here it does not remove the directory.
4. The next tree-filter does not work as expected because there already
exists a directory with the new name.
Just add -d to 'git clean', so that empty directories are removed.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This test currently fails.
If b is a directory then 'mv a b' is not a plain "rename", but really a
"move", so we must also test that the directory does not exist with the
old name in the directory with the new name.
There's also some cleanup in the corresponding "rename file" test to avoid
spurious shell syntax errors and "ambigous ref" error from 'git show' (but
these should show up only if the test would fail anyway). Plus we also
test for the non-existence of the old file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Since nearly its birth, git's tags have included a "tagger" field which
describes the name of tagger, email of tagger, and date and time of tagging.
But, this field was only loosely tested by git-mktag. Provide some thorough
testing for this field and also ensure that the tag header is separated
from the tag body by an empty line to reduce the convenience of creating
a flawed tag.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier, if you changed a staged path into a directory in the work tree,
we happily ran lstat(2) on it and found that it exists, and declared that
the user changed it to a gitlink.
This is wrong for two reasons:
(1) It may be a directory, but it may not be a submodule, and in the
latter case, the change we need to report is "the blob at the path
has disappeared". We need to check with resolve_gitlink_ref() to be
consistent with what "git add" and "git update-index --add" does.
(2) lstat(2) may have succeeded only because a leading component of the
path was turned into a symbolic link that points at something that
exists in the work tree. In such a case, the path itself does not
exist anymore, as far as the index is concerned.
This fixes these breakages in diff-index that the previous patch has
exposed.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
diff-index and diff-files can get confused in corner cases when an indexed
blob turns into something else in the work tree. This patch adds tests to
expose such breakages.
The test is classified under t2XXX series instead of t4XXX series, because
the ultimate objective is to fix "add -u" (and "commit -a" that shares the
same issue).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Finally, this resurrects the documented behaviour to protect other
objects listed on the command line from getting pruned.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It seems that git prune changed behaviour with respect to revisions added
from command line, probably when it became a builtin. Currently, it prints
a short usage and exits: instead, it should take those revisions into
account and not prune them. So add a couple of test to point this out.
We'll be fixing this by switching to parse_options(), so add tests to
detect bogus command line parameters as well, to keep ourselves from
introducing regressions.
Signed-off-by: Michele Ballabio <barra_cuda@katamail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When using the 'p'atch command, instead of just throwing out any mode
change, present it to the user in the same way that we show hunks.
This way, the mode change can be staged independently from the changes
to the contents.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When a path is examined in the patch subcommand, any mode changes in
the file are given to use in the diff header by git-diff. If no hunks
are staged, then we throw out that header and do not touch the
path. But if _any_ hunks are staged, we use the header, and the mode
is changed together with the contents.
Since the 'p'atch command should just be dealing with hunks that are
shown to the user, it makes sense to just ignore mode changes
entirely. We do squirrel away the mode, though, since the next patch
will allow users to select the mode update separately.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Update draft release notes for 1.5.4.5
Documentation: clarify use of .git{ignore,attributes} versus .git/info/*
t/t3800-mktag.sh: use test_must_fail rather than '!'
Conflicts:
t/t3800-mktag.sh
When a git command is run under test_must_fail to make sure that
the argument parser catches bogus command line, it exits with 129.
We need to catch it as a valid "graceful error exit".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
