This patch documents the -n command-line option to git-unpack-objects,
as it was previously undocumented.
Signed-off-by: Nikolai Weibull <nikolai@bitwi.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The comparison to find "Binary files " string was looking at a
wrong place when offset != 0.
Also, we may have the full 40-byte textual sha1 on the index
line; two off-by-one errors prevented it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The -r flag means "rev-list order", i.e. just display the commits
in the order they come from git-rev-list.
The speedups include:
- don't process the whole commit line-by-line, only the header
- don't convert dates when reading the commits, rather do it when
needed
- don't do the $canv delete lines.$id in drawlines when drawing the
graph initially (it was taking a lot of the total time)
- cache the date conversion for each hour (more important with tk8.5,
since [clock format] is a lot slower in 8.5 than in 8.4).
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
This fixes git-rev-list so that when there are multiple branches, we still
sort the heads in proper approximate date order even when sorting the
output topologically.
This makes things like
gitk --all -d
work sanely and show the branches in date order (where "date order" is
obviously modified by the paren-child dependency requirements of the
topological sort).
The trivial fix is to just build the "work" list in date order rather than
inserting the new work entries at the beginning.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Fix a typo: We do not want to run the directory as command,
and want to terminate if the directory exists
Additionally, update the usage message
Signed-off-by: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Stuffing -L flag and friends meant for the linking phase into
ALL_CFLAGS is not right; honor LDFLAGS and introduce ALL_LDFLAGS
to separate them out.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Because we use "lost-found" as the directory name to hold
dangling object names, it is confusing to call the command
git-lost+found, although it makes sense and is even cute ;-).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This fixes compilation warnings where "%ld" was used to print values of
type size_t.
Signed-off-by: Kai Ruemmler <kai.ruemmler@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I don't want to have to install x11-libs and all it's dependencies on
my headless machines, so this patch splits gitk out of the RPM.
The .deb already appears to have gitk split out.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Matysik <thomas@matysik.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Added a call to finish_request to clean up resources if the server
returned a 404 and there are no alternates left to try.
Signed-off-by: Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Stop additional alternates requests from starting if one is already in
progress. This adds an optional callback which is processed after a slot
has finished running.
Signed-off-by: Nick Hengeveld <nickh@reactrix.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is GIT 1.0-rc1 in disguise. It is plausible that
relatively new parts of the system still need tweaking and
fixing, but that is why it is not 1.0 but rc ;-).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-pack-redundant documentation was encoded in latin1, which caused
asciidoc to barf, which expected to see utf-8. Run tcs to re-encode
it in utf-8.
Also just for fun try my name in Japanese in git-lost+found
documentation ;-)
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Just to avoid confusion that scripts poorly written by somebody
else ;-) might mistake this as a mount point, or backup tools
ignoring the directory. The latter is probably not a big loss,
however, considering that this directory's contents are to be
used while fresh anyway.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch changes git-pack-redundant so that packfiles
in alternate object directories also are considered when
deciding which objects are redundant.
This functionality is controlled by the flag '--alt-odb'.
Also convert the other flags to the long form, and update
docs and git-repack accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch renames git-pack-intersect to git-pack-redundant
as suggested by Petr Baudis. The new name reflects what the
program does, rather than how it does it.
Also fix a small argument parsing bug.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch adds the program git-pack-intersect. It is
used to find redundant packs in git repositories.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If two sides added the same path completely different thing, it is
easier to see the merge pivoting on /dev/null. So check the size of
the common section we have found, and empty it if it is too small.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is a specialized hack to help no-base merges, but other
people might find it useful, so let's document it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Unlike the previous round that merged the path added differently
in each branches using emptiness as the base, compute a common
version and use it as input to 'merge' program.
This would show the resulting (still conflicting) file left in
the working tree as:
common file contents...
<<<<<< FILENAME
version from our branch...
======
version from their branch...
>>>>>> .merge_file_XXXXXX
more common file contents...
when both sides added similar contents.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Instead of leaving the path unmerged in a case where each side
adds different version of the same path, attempt to merge it
with empty base and leave "our" version in the index file, just
like we do for the case in conflicting merge.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Makes it less probable that we get a clash with an existing file,
furthermore Cogito already uses '~' for this purpose.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If we have multiple common ancestors and have to recursively merge
them then the output will be much more readable with this commit.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch makes the documentation refer to the index
as index instead of cache, but some references still
remain. (e.g. git-update-index.txt)
Signed-off-by: Lukas Sandström <lukass@etek.chalmers.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Because a batch-oriented script creates many commits within a second
on a fast machine, show-branch output of the test results are unstable
without topo-order.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
With the change in the previous round, we are guaranteed to come up
with the list of all relevant merge bases, but sometimes we do not
fully mark unintersting ones due to a horizon effect. Add a phase to
postprocess, so that we mark all ancestor of "interesting" commit.
This also changes the default ordering of shown commits back to
chronological order, and adds --topo-order flag to show them in
topological order.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes the merge-base computation resistant to the pathological
case discussed on the list earlier, by doing the same logic as
git-merge-base. As a side effect, it breaks the command's primary
function to list non-merge commit sequences, which needs to be fixed
separately.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Although it was shown that the "full contamination" was not really full
during the list discussion, the series improves things without incurring
extra parsing cost, and here is a test to check that.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When we have only one merge-base candidates in the result list,
there is no point going back to mark the reachable commits
again. And that is the most common case, so try not to waste
time on it. Suggested by Linus.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The discussion on the list demonstrated a pathological case where
an ancestor of a merge-base can be left interesting. This commit
introduces a postprocessing phase to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
