mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-10-28 21:07:52 +01:00
409047a2b3
Some users have expressed interest in a more "batteries included" way of
building via CMake[1], and a big part of that is providing easier access
to tooling external tools.
A straightforward way to accomplish this is to make it as simple as
possible is to enable the generation of the compile_commands.json file,
which is supported by many tools such as: clang-tidy, clang-format,
sourcetrail, etc.
This does come with a small run-time overhead during the configuration
step (~6 seconds on my machine):
Time to configure with CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=TRUE
real 1m9.840s
user 0m0.031s
sys 0m0.031s
Time to configure with CMAKE_EXPORT_COMPILE_COMMANDS=FALSE
real 1m3.195s
user 0m0.015s
sys 0m0.015s
This seems like a small enough price to pay to make the project more
accessible to newer users. Additionally there are other large projects
like llvm [2] which has had this enabled by default for >6 years at the
time of this writing, and no real negative consequences that I can find
with my search-skills.
NOTE: That the compile_commands.json is currently produced only when
using the Ninja and Makefile generators. See The CMake documentation[3]
for more info.
1: https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAOjrSZusMSvs7AS-ZDsV8aQUgsF2ZA754vSDjgFKMRgi_oZAWw@mail.gmail.com/
2:
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
buildsystems | ||
coccinelle | ||
completion | ||
contacts | ||
credential | ||
diff-highlight | ||
emacs | ||
examples | ||
fast-import | ||
git-jump | ||
git-shell-commands | ||
hg-to-git | ||
hooks | ||
long-running-filter | ||
mw-to-git | ||
persistent-https | ||
remote-helpers | ||
stats | ||
subtree | ||
thunderbird-patch-inline | ||
update-unicode | ||
vscode | ||
workdir | ||
coverage-diff.sh | ||
git-resurrect.sh | ||
README | ||
remotes2config.sh | ||
rerere-train.sh |
Contributed Software Although these pieces are available as part of the official git source tree, they are in somewhat different status. The intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them, and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved faster. I am not expecting to touch these myself that much. As far as my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are owned by their respective primary authors. I am willing to help if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners" have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree owners. IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch. If you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer). This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the drill. I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused and inactive ones from time to time. If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves there are some general interests (it does not have to be a list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport), submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your stuff there. -jc