mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-11-01 14:57:52 +01:00
6ccc71a9d0
The documentation says that --squash is for 'add', 'merge', 'pull' and 'push', while --squash actually doesn't change the behavior of 'push'. Correct the documentation. Signed-off-by: Danny Lin <danny0838@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
351 lines
12 KiB
Text
351 lines
12 KiB
Text
git-subtree(1)
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
NAME
|
|
----
|
|
git-subtree - Merge subtrees together and split repository into subtrees
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYNOPSIS
|
|
--------
|
|
[verse]
|
|
'git subtree' add -P <prefix> <commit>
|
|
'git subtree' add -P <prefix> <repository> <ref>
|
|
'git subtree' pull -P <prefix> <repository> <ref>
|
|
'git subtree' push -P <prefix> <repository> <ref>
|
|
'git subtree' merge -P <prefix> <commit>
|
|
'git subtree' split -P <prefix> [OPTIONS] [<commit>]
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
-----------
|
|
Subtrees allow subprojects to be included within a subdirectory
|
|
of the main project, optionally including the subproject's
|
|
entire history.
|
|
|
|
For example, you could include the source code for a library
|
|
as a subdirectory of your application.
|
|
|
|
Subtrees are not to be confused with submodules, which are meant for
|
|
the same task. Unlike submodules, subtrees do not need any special
|
|
constructions (like .gitmodule files or gitlinks) be present in
|
|
your repository, and do not force end-users of your
|
|
repository to do anything special or to understand how subtrees
|
|
work. A subtree is just a subdirectory that can be
|
|
committed to, branched, and merged along with your project in
|
|
any way you want.
|
|
|
|
They are also not to be confused with using the subtree merge
|
|
strategy. The main difference is that, besides merging
|
|
the other project as a subdirectory, you can also extract the
|
|
entire history of a subdirectory from your project and make it
|
|
into a standalone project. Unlike the subtree merge strategy
|
|
you can alternate back and forth between these
|
|
two operations. If the standalone library gets updated, you can
|
|
automatically merge the changes into your project; if you
|
|
update the library inside your project, you can "split" the
|
|
changes back out again and merge them back into the library
|
|
project.
|
|
|
|
For example, if a library you made for one application ends up being
|
|
useful elsewhere, you can extract its entire history and publish
|
|
that as its own git repository, without accidentally
|
|
intermingling the history of your application project.
|
|
|
|
[TIP]
|
|
In order to keep your commit messages clean, we recommend that
|
|
people split their commits between the subtrees and the main
|
|
project as much as possible. That is, if you make a change that
|
|
affects both the library and the main application, commit it in
|
|
two pieces. That way, when you split the library commits out
|
|
later, their descriptions will still make sense. But if this
|
|
isn't important to you, it's not *necessary*. git subtree will
|
|
simply leave out the non-library-related parts of the commit
|
|
when it splits it out into the subproject later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMANDS
|
|
--------
|
|
add::
|
|
Create the <prefix> subtree by importing its contents
|
|
from the given <commit> or <repository> and remote <ref>.
|
|
A new commit is created automatically, joining the imported
|
|
project's history with your own. With '--squash', imports
|
|
only a single commit from the subproject, rather than its
|
|
entire history.
|
|
|
|
merge::
|
|
Merge recent changes up to <commit> into the <prefix>
|
|
subtree. As with normal 'git merge', this doesn't
|
|
remove your own local changes; it just merges those
|
|
changes into the latest <commit>. With '--squash',
|
|
creates only one commit that contains all the changes,
|
|
rather than merging in the entire history.
|
|
+
|
|
If you use '--squash', the merge direction doesn't always have to be
|
|
forward; you can use this command to go back in time from v2.5 to v2.4,
|
|
for example. If your merge introduces a conflict, you can resolve it in
|
|
the usual ways.
|
|
|
|
pull::
|
|
Exactly like 'merge', but parallels 'git pull' in that
|
|
it fetches the given ref from the specified remote
|
|
repository.
|
|
|
|
push::
|
|
Does a 'split' (see below) using the <prefix> supplied
|
|
and then does a 'git push' to push the result to the
|
|
repository and ref. This can be used to push your
|
|
subtree to different branches of the remote repository.
|
|
|
|
split::
|
|
Extract a new, synthetic project history from the
|
|
history of the <prefix> subtree. The new history
|
|
includes only the commits (including merges) that
|
|
affected <prefix>, and each of those commits now has the
|
|
contents of <prefix> at the root of the project instead
|
|
of in a subdirectory. Thus, the newly created history
|
|
is suitable for export as a separate git repository.
|
|
+
|
|
After splitting successfully, a single commit id is printed to stdout.
|
|
This corresponds to the HEAD of the newly created tree, which you can
|
|
manipulate however you want.
|
|
+
|
|
Repeated splits of exactly the same history are guaranteed to be
|
|
identical (i.e. to produce the same commit ids). Because of this, if
|
|
you add new commits and then re-split, the new commits will be attached
|
|
as commits on top of the history you generated last time, so 'git merge'
|
|
and friends will work as expected.
|
|
+
|
|
Note that if you use '--squash' when you merge, you should usually not
|
|
just '--rejoin' when you split.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS
|
|
-------
|
|
-q::
|
|
--quiet::
|
|
Suppress unnecessary output messages on stderr.
|
|
|
|
-d::
|
|
--debug::
|
|
Produce even more unnecessary output messages on stderr.
|
|
|
|
-P <prefix>::
|
|
--prefix=<prefix>::
|
|
Specify the path in the repository to the subtree you
|
|
want to manipulate. This option is mandatory
|
|
for all commands.
|
|
|
|
-m <message>::
|
|
--message=<message>::
|
|
This option is only valid for add, merge and pull (unsure).
|
|
Specify <message> as the commit message for the merge commit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS FOR add, merge, push, pull
|
|
----------------------------------
|
|
--squash::
|
|
This option is only valid for add, merge, and pull
|
|
commands.
|
|
+
|
|
Instead of merging the entire history from the subtree project, produce
|
|
only a single commit that contains all the differences you want to
|
|
merge, and then merge that new commit into your project.
|
|
+
|
|
Using this option helps to reduce log clutter. People rarely want to see
|
|
every change that happened between v1.0 and v1.1 of the library they're
|
|
using, since none of the interim versions were ever included in their
|
|
application.
|
|
+
|
|
Using '--squash' also helps avoid problems when the same subproject is
|
|
included multiple times in the same project, or is removed and then
|
|
re-added. In such a case, it doesn't make sense to combine the
|
|
histories anyway, since it's unclear which part of the history belongs
|
|
to which subtree.
|
|
+
|
|
Furthermore, with '--squash', you can switch back and forth between
|
|
different versions of a subtree, rather than strictly forward. 'git
|
|
subtree merge --squash' always adjusts the subtree to match the exactly
|
|
specified commit, even if getting to that commit would require undoing
|
|
some changes that were added earlier.
|
|
+
|
|
Whether or not you use '--squash', changes made in your local repository
|
|
remain intact and can be later split and send upstream to the
|
|
subproject.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPTIONS FOR split
|
|
-----------------
|
|
--annotate=<annotation>::
|
|
This option is only valid for the split command.
|
|
+
|
|
When generating synthetic history, add <annotation> as a prefix to each
|
|
commit message. Since we're creating new commits with the same commit
|
|
message, but possibly different content, from the original commits, this
|
|
can help to differentiate them and avoid confusion.
|
|
+
|
|
Whenever you split, you need to use the same <annotation>, or else you
|
|
don't have a guarantee that the new re-created history will be identical
|
|
to the old one. That will prevent merging from working correctly. git
|
|
subtree tries to make it work anyway, particularly if you use --rejoin,
|
|
but it may not always be effective.
|
|
|
|
-b <branch>::
|
|
--branch=<branch>::
|
|
This option is only valid for the split command.
|
|
+
|
|
After generating the synthetic history, create a new branch called
|
|
<branch> that contains the new history. This is suitable for immediate
|
|
pushing upstream. <branch> must not already exist.
|
|
|
|
--ignore-joins::
|
|
This option is only valid for the split command.
|
|
+
|
|
If you use '--rejoin', git subtree attempts to optimize its history
|
|
reconstruction to generate only the new commits since the last
|
|
'--rejoin'. '--ignore-join' disables this behaviour, forcing it to
|
|
regenerate the entire history. In a large project, this can take a long
|
|
time.
|
|
|
|
--onto=<onto>::
|
|
This option is only valid for the split command.
|
|
+
|
|
If your subtree was originally imported using something other than git
|
|
subtree, its history may not match what git subtree is expecting. In
|
|
that case, you can specify the commit id <onto> that corresponds to the
|
|
first revision of the subproject's history that was imported into your
|
|
project, and git subtree will attempt to build its history from there.
|
|
+
|
|
If you used 'git subtree add', you should never need this option.
|
|
|
|
--rejoin::
|
|
This option is only valid for the split command.
|
|
+
|
|
After splitting, merge the newly created synthetic history back into
|
|
your main project. That way, future splits can search only the part of
|
|
history that has been added since the most recent --rejoin.
|
|
+
|
|
If your split commits end up merged into the upstream subproject, and
|
|
then you want to get the latest upstream version, this will allow git's
|
|
merge algorithm to more intelligently avoid conflicts (since it knows
|
|
these synthetic commits are already part of the upstream repository).
|
|
+
|
|
Unfortunately, using this option results in 'git log' showing an extra
|
|
copy of every new commit that was created (the original, and the
|
|
synthetic one).
|
|
+
|
|
If you do all your merges with '--squash', don't use '--rejoin' when you
|
|
split, because you don't want the subproject's history to be part of
|
|
your project anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 1. Add command
|
|
----------------------
|
|
Let's assume that you have a local repository that you would like
|
|
to add an external vendor library to. In this case we will add the
|
|
git-subtree repository as a subdirectory of your already existing
|
|
git-extensions repository in ~/git-extensions/:
|
|
|
|
$ git subtree add --prefix=git-subtree --squash \
|
|
git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git master
|
|
|
|
'master' needs to be a valid remote ref and can be a different branch
|
|
name
|
|
|
|
You can omit the --squash flag, but doing so will increase the number
|
|
of commits that are included in your local repository.
|
|
|
|
We now have a ~/git-extensions/git-subtree directory containing code
|
|
from the master branch of git://github.com/apenwarr/git-subtree.git
|
|
in our git-extensions repository.
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 2. Extract a subtree using commit, merge and pull
|
|
---------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Let's use the repository for the git source code as an example.
|
|
First, get your own copy of the git.git repository:
|
|
|
|
$ git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git test-git
|
|
$ cd test-git
|
|
|
|
gitweb (commit 1130ef3) was merged into git as of commit
|
|
0a8f4f0, after which it was no longer maintained separately.
|
|
But imagine it had been maintained separately, and we wanted to
|
|
extract git's changes to gitweb since that time, to share with
|
|
the upstream. You could do this:
|
|
|
|
$ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' \
|
|
0a8f4f0^.. --onto=1130ef3 --rejoin \
|
|
--branch gitweb-latest
|
|
$ gitk gitweb-latest
|
|
$ git push git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git gitweb-latest:master
|
|
|
|
(We use '0a8f4f0^..' because that means "all the changes from
|
|
0a8f4f0 to the current version, including 0a8f4f0 itself.")
|
|
|
|
If gitweb had originally been merged using 'git subtree add' (or
|
|
a previous split had already been done with --rejoin specified)
|
|
then you can do all your splits without having to remember any
|
|
weird commit ids:
|
|
|
|
$ git subtree split --prefix=gitweb --annotate='(split) ' --rejoin \
|
|
--branch gitweb-latest2
|
|
|
|
And you can merge changes back in from the upstream project just
|
|
as easily:
|
|
|
|
$ git subtree pull --prefix=gitweb \
|
|
git@github.com:whatever/gitweb.git master
|
|
|
|
Or, using '--squash', you can actually rewind to an earlier
|
|
version of gitweb:
|
|
|
|
$ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest~10
|
|
|
|
Then make some changes:
|
|
|
|
$ date >gitweb/myfile
|
|
$ git add gitweb/myfile
|
|
$ git commit -m 'created myfile'
|
|
|
|
And fast forward again:
|
|
|
|
$ git subtree merge --prefix=gitweb --squash gitweb-latest
|
|
|
|
And notice that your change is still intact:
|
|
|
|
$ ls -l gitweb/myfile
|
|
|
|
And you can split it out and look at your changes versus
|
|
the standard gitweb:
|
|
|
|
git log gitweb-latest..$(git subtree split --prefix=gitweb)
|
|
|
|
EXAMPLE 3. Extract a subtree using branch
|
|
-----------------------------------------
|
|
Suppose you have a source directory with many files and
|
|
subdirectories, and you want to extract the lib directory to its own
|
|
git project. Here's a short way to do it:
|
|
|
|
First, make the new repository wherever you want:
|
|
|
|
$ <go to the new location>
|
|
$ git init --bare
|
|
|
|
Back in your original directory:
|
|
|
|
$ git subtree split --prefix=lib --annotate="(split)" -b split
|
|
|
|
Then push the new branch onto the new empty repository:
|
|
|
|
$ git push <new-repo> split:master
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUTHOR
|
|
------
|
|
Written by Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIT
|
|
---
|
|
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite
|