mirror of
https://github.com/git/git.git
synced 2024-11-01 23:07:55 +01:00
f12785a3a7
Our git-aware path completion doesn't work when it has to complete a word already containing quoted and/or backslash-escaped characters on the command line. The root cause of the issue is that completion functions see all words on the command line verbatim, i.e. including all backslash, single and double quote characters that the shell would eventually remove when executing the finished command. These quoting/escaping characters cause different issues depending on which path component of the word to be completed contains them: - The quoting/escaping is in the prefix path component(s). Let's suppose we have a directory called 'New Dir', containing two untracked files 'file.c' and 'file.o', and we have a gitignore rule ignoring object files. In this case all of these: git add New\ Dir/<TAB> git add "New Dir/<TAB> git add 'New Dir/<TAB> should uniquely complete 'file.c' right away, but Bash offers both 'file.c' and 'file.o' instead. The reason for this behavior is that our completion script uses the prefix directory name like 'git -C "New\ Dir/" ls-files ...", i.e. with the backslash inside double quotes. Git then tries to enter a directory called 'New\ Dir', which (most likely) fails because such a directory doesn't exists. As a result our completion script doesn't list any files, leaves the COMPREPLY array empty, which in turn causes Bash to fall back to its simple filename completion and lists all files in that directory, i.e. both 'file.c' and 'file.o'. - The quoting/escaping is in the path component to be completed. Let's suppose we have two untracked files 'New File.c' and 'New File.o', and we have a gitignore rule ignoring object files. In this case all of these: git add New\ Fi<TAB> git add "New Fi<TAB> git add 'New Fi<TAB> should uniquely complete 'New File.c' right away, but Bash offers both 'New File.c' and 'New File.o' instead. The reason for this behavior is that our completion script uses this 'New\ Fi' or '"New Fi' etc. word to filter matching paths, and of course none of the potential filenames will match because of the included backslash or double quote. The end result is the same as above: the completion script doesn't list any files, Bash falls back to its filename completion, which then lists the matching object file as well. Add the new helper function __git_dequote() [1], which removes (most of[2]) the quoting and escaping from the word it gets as argument. To minimize the overhead of calling this function, store its result in the variable $dequoted_word, supposed to be declared local in the caller; simply printing the result would require a command substitution imposing the overhead of fork()ing a subshell. Use this function in __git_complete_index_file() to dequote the current word, i.e. the path, to be completed, to avoid the above described quoting-related issues, thereby fixing two of the failing quoted path completion tests. [1] The bash-completion project already has a dequote() function, which I hoped I could borrow to deal with this, but unfortunately it doesn't work quite well for this purpose (perhaps that's why even the bash-completion project only rarely uses it). The main issue is that their dequote() is implemented as: eval printf %s "$1" 2> /dev/null where $1 would contain the word to be completed. While it's a short and sweet one-liner, the use of 'eval' requires that $1 is a syntactically valid string, which is not the case when quoting the path like 'git add "New Dir/<TAB>'. This causes 'eval' to fail, because it can't find the matching closing double quote, and the function returns nothing. The result is totally broken behavior, as if the current word were empty, and the completion script would then list all files from the current directory. This is why one of the quoted path completion tests specifically checks the completion of a path with an opening but without a corresponding closing double quote character. Furthermore, the 'eval' performs all kinds of expansions, which may or may not be desired; I think it's the latter. Finally, using this function would require a command substitution. [2] Bash understands the $'string' quoting as well, which "expands to 'string', with backslash-escaped characters replaced as specified by the ANSI C standard" (quoted from Bash manpage). Since shell metacharacters, field separators, globbing, etc. can all be easily entered using standard shell escaping or quoting, this type of quoting comes in handly when dealing with control characters that are otherwise difficult both to "type" and to see on the command line. Because of this difficulty I would assume that people do avoid pathnames with such control characters anyway, so I didn't bother implementing it. This function is already way too long as it is. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
buildsystems | ||
coccinelle | ||
completion | ||
contacts | ||
credential | ||
diff-highlight | ||
emacs | ||
examples | ||
fast-import | ||
git-jump | ||
git-shell-commands | ||
hg-to-git | ||
hooks | ||
long-running-filter | ||
mw-to-git | ||
persistent-https | ||
remote-helpers | ||
stats | ||
subtree | ||
svn-fe | ||
thunderbird-patch-inline | ||
update-unicode | ||
workdir | ||
convert-grafts-to-replace-refs.sh | ||
git-resurrect.sh | ||
README | ||
remotes2config.sh | ||
rerere-train.sh |
Contributed Software Although these pieces are available as part of the official git source tree, they are in somewhat different status. The intention is to keep interesting tools around git here, maybe even experimental ones, to give users an easier access to them, and to give tools wider exposure, so that they can be improved faster. I am not expecting to touch these myself that much. As far as my day-to-day operation is concerned, these subdirectories are owned by their respective primary authors. I am willing to help if users of these components and the contrib/ subtree "owners" have technical/design issues to resolve, but the initiative to fix and/or enhance things _must_ be on the side of the subtree owners. IOW, I won't be actively looking for bugs and rooms for enhancements in them as the git maintainer -- I may only do so just as one of the users when I want to scratch my own itch. If you have patches to things in contrib/ area, the patch should be first sent to the primary author, and then the primary author should ack and forward it to me (git pull request is nicer). This is the same way as how I have been treating gitk, and to a lesser degree various foreign SCM interfaces, so you know the drill. I expect that things that start their life in the contrib/ area to graduate out of contrib/ once they mature, either by becoming projects on their own, or moving to the toplevel directory. On the other hand, I expect I'll be proposing removal of disused and inactive ones from time to time. If you have new things to add to this area, please first propose it on the git mailing list, and after a list discussion proves there are some general interests (it does not have to be a list-wide consensus for a tool targeted to a relatively narrow audience -- for example I do not work with projects whose upstream is svn, so I have no use for git-svn myself, but it is of general interest for people who need to interoperate with SVN repositories in a way git-svn works better than git-svnimport), submit a patch to create a subdirectory of contrib/ and put your stuff there. -jc