rebase supports --strategy, so pull should pass the option along to it.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We used to just memcpy() the index entry when we copied the stat() and
SHA1 hash information, which worked well enough back when the index
entry was just an exact bit-for-bit representation of the information on
disk.
However, these days we actually have various management information in
the cache entry too, and we should be careful to not overwrite it when
we copy the stat information from another index entry.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes the name hash removal function (which really just sets the
bit that disables lookups of it) available to external routines, and
makes read_cache_unmerged() use it when it drops an unmerged entry from
the index.
It's renamed to remove_index_entry(), and we drop the (unused) 'istate'
argument.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We handled the case of removing and re-inserting cache entries badly,
which is something that merging commonly needs to do (removing the
different stages, and then re-inserting one of them as the merged
state).
We even had a rather ugly special case for this failure case, where
replace_index_entry() basically turned itself into a no-op if the new
and the old entries were the same, exactly because the hash routines
didn't handle it on their own.
So what this patch does is to not just have the UNHASHED bit, but a
HASHED bit too, and when you insert an entry into the name hash, that
involves:
- clear the UNHASHED bit, because now it's valid again for lookup
(which is really all that UNHASHED meant)
- if we're being lazy, we're done here (but we still want to clear the
UNHASHED bit regardless of lazy mode, since we can become unlazy
later, and so we need the UNHASHED bit to always be set correctly,
even if we never actually insert the entry into the hash list)
- if it was already hashed, we just leave it on the list
- otherwise mark it HASHED and insert it into the list
this all means that unhashing and rehashing a name all just works
automatically. Obviously, you cannot change the name of an entry (that
would be a serious bug), but nothing can validly do that anyway (you'd
have to allocate a new struct cache_entry anyway since the name length
could change), so that's not a new limitation.
The code actually gets simpler in many ways, although the lazy hashing
does mean that there are a few odd cases (ie something can be marked
unhashed even though it was never on the hash in the first place, and
isn't actually marked hashed!).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We were returning the _address of_ the stored item (or NULL)
instead of the item itself. While this sort of indirection
is useful for insertion (since you can lookup and then
modify), it is unnecessary for read-only lookup. Since the
hash code splits these functions between the internal
lookup_hash_entry function and the public lookup_hash
function, it makes sense for the latter to provide what
users of the library expect.
The result of this was that the index caching returned bogus
results on lookup. We unfortunately didn't catch this
because we were returning a "struct cache_entry **" as a
"void *", and accidentally assigning it to a "struct
cache_entry *".
As it happens, this actually _worked_ most of the time,
because the entries were defined as:
struct cache_entry {
struct cache_entry *next;
...
};
meaning that interpreting a "struct cache_entry **" as a
"struct cache_entry *" would yield an entry where all fields
were totally bogus _except_ for the next pointer, which
pointed to the actual cache entry. When walking the list, we
would look at the bogus "name" field, which was unlikely to
match our lookup, and then proceed to the "real" entry.
The reading of bogus data was silently ignored most of the
time, but could cause a segfault for some data (which seems
to be more common on OS X).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When searching commit messages (commit search), if matched string is
too long, the generated HTML was munged leading to an ill-formed XHTML
document.
Now gitweb chop leading, trailing and matched parts, HTML escapes
those parts, then composes and marks up match info. HTML output is
never chopped. Limiting matched info to 80 columns (with slop) is now
done by dividing remaining characters after chopping match equally to
leading and trailing part, not by chopping composed and HTML marked
output.
Noticed-by: Jean-Baptiste Quenot <jbq@caraldi.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
After changing builtin-tag.c to use strbuf in fd17f5b (Replace all
read_fd use with strbuf_read, and get rid of it.), the last condition
in do_sign() will always be false, as it's checked already right
above. So let's remove the cruft.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The options following <merge-program> are not -a, --, or <file>...,
but either -a, or -- <file>..., while -- is optional.
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Fix a regression introduced by
1ca3d6e (send-email: squelch warning due to comparing undefined $_ to "")
where if the user was prompted for an initial In-Reply-To and didn't
provide one, messages would be sent out with an invalid In-Reply-To of
"<>"
Also add test cases for the regression and the fix. A small modification
was needed to allow send-email to take its replies from stdin if the
environment variable GIT_SEND_EMAIL_NOTTY is set.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When invalidating unmerged entries in the index, we used to set
their ce_mode to 0 to note the fact that they do not matter
anymore which also made sure that later unpack_trees() call
would not reuse them. Instead just remove them from the index.
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
I expected git grep --name-only to give me only the file names,
much as git diff --name-only only generates filenames. Alas the
option is -l, which matches common external greps but doesn't match
other parts of the git UI.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The Solaris regex library doesn't like having the '$' anchor
inside capture parentheses. It rejects the match, causing
t4018 to fail.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The fake-editor shell script invoked /bin/sh; normally this
is fine, unless the /bin/sh doesn't meet our compatibility
requirements, as is the case with Solaris. Specifically, the
$() syntax used by fake-editor is not understood.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
These functions get called by other code, including parsing
config options from the command line. In that case,
config_file_name is NULL, leading to an ugly message or even
a segfault on some implementations of printf.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-clean simply ignored errors if removing a file or directory failed. This
patch makes it raise a warning and the exit code also greater than zero if
there are remaining files.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* jc/setup:
builtin-mv: minimum fix to avoid losing files
git-add: adjust to the get_pathspec() changes.
Make blame accept absolute paths
setup: sanitize absolute and funny paths in get_pathspec()
* maint:
Clarified the meaning of git-add -u in the documentation
git-clone.sh: properly configure remote even if remote's head is dangling
Documentation/git-stash: document options for git stash list
send-email: squelch warning due to comparing undefined $_ to ""
The git-add documentation did not state clearly that the -u switch
updates only the tracked files that are in the current directory and
its subdirectories.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Kaitaniemi <kaitanie@cc.helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When cloning a remote repository which's HEAD refers to a nonexistent
ref, git-clone cloned all existing refs, but failed to write the
configuration for 'remote'. Now it detects the dangling remote HEAD,
refuses to checkout any local branch since HEAD refers to nowhere, but
properly writes the configuration for 'remote', so that subsequent
'git fetch's don't fail.
The problem was reported by Daniel Jacobowitz through
http://bugs.debian.org/466581
Signed-off-by: Gerrit Pape <pape@smarden.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This will make it a little less posix-dependent, and more efficient.
Included is also a minor doc improvement.
Signed-off-by: David Kågedal <davidk@lysator.liu.se>
Acked-by: Alexandre Julliard <julliard@winehq.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The check to see if initial_reply_to is defined was also comparing $_ to
"" for a reason I cannot ascertain (looking at the commit which made the
change didn't provide enlightenment), but if $_ is undefined, perl
generates a warning.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* maint:
Rename git-core rpm to just git and rename the meta-pacakge to git-all.
push: document the status output
Documentation/push: clarify matching refspec behavior
push: indicate partialness of error message
In my use cases, "cvs status" sometimes reordered the passed filenames,
which often led to a misdetection of a dirty state (when it was in
reality a clean state).
I finally tracked it down to two filenames having the same basename.
So no longer trust the order of the results blindly, but actually check
the file name.
Since "cvs status" only returns the basename (and the complete path on the
server which is useless for our purposes), run "cvs status" several times
with lists consisting of files with unique (chomped) basenames.
Be a bit clever about new files: these are reported as "no file <blabla>",
so in order to discern it from existing files, prepend "no file " to the
basename.
In other words, one call to "cvs status" will not ask for two files
"blabla" (which does not yet exist) and "no file blabla" (which exists).
This patch makes cvsexportcommit slightly slower, when the list of changed
files has non-unique basenames, but at least it is accurate now.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This fixes my favorite annoyance with the git rpm packaging: don't pull
in tla when I say yum install git! You wouldn't expect yum install gcc
to pull in gcc-gfortran, right?
With this change, and blanket 'yum update' will automatically pull in the
new 'git' package and push out the old 'git-core', and if the old 'git'
package was installed 'git-all' will be pulled in instead. A couple of
things do break though: 'yum update git-core', because yum behaves
differently when given a specific package name - it doesn't follow obsoletes.
Instead, 'yum install git' will pull in the new git rpm, which will then
push out the old 'git-core'. Similarly, to get the newest version of
the meta package, 'yum install git-all' will install git-all, which then
pushes out the old 'git' meta package.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The --rebase option was documented in the wrong place (under MERGE
STRATEGIES instead of OPTIONS). Noted the branch.<name>.rebase
option.
Signed-off-by: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
URLs generated by href(..., -replay=>1) (which includes 'next page'
links and alternate view links) didn't set project info correctly
when current page URL is in pathinfo form.
This resulted in broken links such like:
http://www.example.com/w/ARRAY(0x85a5318)?a=shortlog;pg=1
if the 'pathinfo' feature was used, or
http://www.example.com/w/?a=shortlog;pg=1
if it wasn't, instead of correct:
http://www.example.com/w/project.git?a=shortlog;pg=1
This was caused by the fact that href() always replays params in the
arrayref form, were they multivalued or singlevalued, and the code
dealing with 'pathinfo' feature couldn't deal with $params{'project'}
being arrayref.
Setting $params{'project'} is moved before replaying params; this
ensures that 'project' parameter is processed correctly.
Noticed-by: Peter Oberndorfer <kumbayo84@arcor.de>
Noticed-by: Wincent Colaiuta <win@wincent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The output was meant to be a balance of self-explanatory and
terse. In case we have erred too far on the terse side, it
doesn't hurt to explain in more detail what each line means.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The previous text was correct, but it was easy to miss the
fact that we are talking about "matching" refs. That is, the
text can be parsed as "we push the union of the sets
of remote and local heads" and not "we push the intersection
of the sets of remote and local heads". (The former actually
doesn't make sense if you think about it, since we don't
even _have_ some of those heads). A careful reading would
reveal the correct meaning, but it makes sense to be as
explicit as possible in documentation.
We also explicitly use and introduce the term "matching";
this is a term discussed on the list, and it seems useful
to for users to be able to refer to this behavior by name.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The existing message indicates that an error occured during
push, but it is unclear whether _any_ refs were actually
pushed (even though the status table above shows which were
pushed successfully and which were not, the message "failed
to push" implies a total failure). By indicating that "some
refs" failed, we hopefully indicate to the user that the
table above contains the details.
We could also put in an explicit "see above for details"
message, but it seemed to clutter the output quite a bit
(both on a line of its own, or at the end of the error line,
which inevitably wraps).
This could also be made more fancy if the transport
mechanism passed back more details on how many refs
succeeded and failed:
error: failed to push %d out of %d refs to '%s'
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Using 'git rev-parse --git-dir' makes the code shorter and more future-
proof.
Signed-off-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* mk/maint-parse-careful:
peel_onion: handle NULL
check return value from parse_commit() in various functions
parse_commit: don't fail, if object is NULL
revision.c: handle tag->tagged == NULL
reachable.c::process_tree/blob: check for NULL
process_tag: handle tag->tagged == NULL
check results of parse_commit in merge_bases
list-objects.c::process_tree/blob: check for NULL
reachable.c::add_one_tree: handle NULL from lookup_tree
mark_blob/tree_uninteresting: check for NULL
get_sha1_oneline: check return value of parse_object
read_object_with_reference: don't read beyond the buffer
Some codepaths (eg. builtin-rev-parse -> get_merge_bases -> parse_commit)
can pass NULL.
Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As these functions are directly called with the result
from lookup_tree/blob, they must handle NULL.
Signed-off-by: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
